NVIDIA launch 9-series GeForce IGP and get Macbook deals

Wednesday 15th October 2008, 08:29:00 PM, written by Rys

Yesterday saw the launch of a new round of Macbooks, and with them a new GeForce 9-series IGP from NVIDIA.  The chip is brand new silicon, and is also showing up in Intel-based mainboards from a few vendors.

The chip -- as well as integrating a single G92-class SM with high hot clock and surrounding logic for graphics acceleration -- also integrates a new DDR2- and DDR3-capable memory controller, a display controller with an integrated DisplayPort transmitter (as well as TMDS-based outputs like HDMI), 20 lanes of PCIe 2.0 and a 1333MHz-supporting AGTL+ bus to talk to the latest 45nm Intel dual- and quad-core CPUs.

The 1.2GHz hot clock and 580MHz base clock for the range-topping GeForce 9400M gives it impressive on-paper performance, although none of the launch configurations sport dedicated off-chip memory, instead sharing system RAM for framebuffer.  Competing solutions from ATI have that support, which definitely helps performance in many situations.

Apple pair the IGP with a discrete GeForce 9600M in the Macbook Pro, the Cupertino-based company forgoing discrete help on the low-end Macbook.  Both products continue to have less-than-low-end prices though, especially the Macbook Pro, lessening the appeal of the graphics configuration somewhat. £1700 for the appealing Macbook Pro is crazy for 1440x900 especially.  Resolution rant over!

Hybrid SLI and Hybrid Power are supported, although the latter only in select configurations, which seems to hint at its overall popularity in the market.

6 SATA and a GigE MAC round off the notable silicon-level features, although current mainboard designs look a bit silly in places when it comes to the physical placement of the former ports.

Performance is competitive for the most part, the 9400M beating ATI's 780G in gaming usually, and video decode performance is fine, although VC-1 sees continued neglect.  In perspective, the gaming performance is actually pretty terrible compared to what even cheap discrete will get you, but it'll drive media centres and notebooks well enough, and squeeze in a little WoW to boot.

The Tech Report took a look at 9400M for launch, and found that while it did well enough, there's a little software-based polish yet to find, both in drivers and the BIOS program, before it truly shines.

Read their impressive analysis for the full tech report.
Discuss on the forums

Tagging

nvidia ± tech, report, igps, really, suck, new, memory, controller


Latest Thread Comments (5 total)
Posted by Curt on Sunday, 23-Nov-08 15:25:13 UTC
"... less-than-low-end prices..."How is this a bad thing? Please elaborate :p

Posted by Zaphod on Sunday, 23-Nov-08 16:36:22 UTC
As usual the nVidia chipsets scores (much) better for SATA write speed that the sustained buffer-to-disk specs (84MB/s) of the drive they're testing with... You'd think they'd catch on eventually to the fact that the test obviously is invalid, but apparently not.

Posted by Davros on Sunday, 23-Nov-08 20:41:30 UTC
why is the test invalid ?

Posted by Zaphod on Sunday, 23-Nov-08 21:23:15 UTC
It giving faster results than the disk is capable of on some platforms should be a giveaway. HDTach is getting very old, and with newer chipsets and newer drives with larger caches it wouldn't surprise me to find that it's just not always accurate anymore.

Posted by Davros on Sunday, 23-Nov-08 23:52:08 UTC
thanks....


Add your comment in the forums

Related nvidia News

NVIDIA quietly release 9 cluster GTX 260
RWT on NVIDIA GT200
NVIDIA release CUDA 2.0
NVIDIA's Huang admits to underestimating ATI
NVIDIA release beta OpenGL 3.0 driver following SIGGRAPH session
NVIDIA release Cg 2.1 Beta and Gamefest presentations
NVIDIA denies exit from core logic market
NVIDIA releases beta Forceware update
NVIDIA PerfHUD 6.0 released
NVIDIA SLI to be available with upcoming Intel desktop computing platform