ATI Radeon HD 5670 released, bringing DX11 for less than $100

Thursday 14th January 2010, 09:17:00 PM, written by Rys

ATI's march across the plains of consumer graphics carries on unabated today with the release of Radeon HD 5670, the start of a sub-$100 lineup of DX11-class products powered by one of two new GPUs.  HD 5670 contains the first, Redwood (RV830), a 104 square millimetre part manufactured by TSMC on their 40nm node (40G unless we're mistaken).

The 627M transistors comprise what's effectively half of Juniper's core execution resources with the same 128-bit GDDR5 memory controller.  That means 400 ALUs, 80 to a SIMD, with each SIMD connected to a texture unit that'll bilinearly filter 4 texture samples in a single of HD 5670's 775 MHz.  Two quad ROPs run at chip rate, finishing 8 pixels in a clock, and the whole thing supports the entirety of DX11's stringent spec in less than 75 watts.

HD 5670 also sports a trio of display outputs, supporting Eyefinity (so DVI, VGA and DisplayPort), and 1 GiB of 4GHz GDDR5.  The cooler is small and quiet from the looks of it, and the board itself is a far cry physically from something like HD 5870.

That means no auxiliary power connector from your PSU, which further keeps costs down and let's ATI sell you one for the initial price of $99, with absolutely no supply problem of any kind.  $99 pits it square against NVIDIA GeForce GT 240.  GT 240 uses GT215 and it's roughly the same size on TSMC 40nm (40G again), and costs almost as much at $89 (NVIDIA have since squeezed 9800 GT -- G92b on 55nm -- in at $99, but it's a margin killer for them and exists to spoil the launch of HD 5670, although the customer shouldn't care about that).

Performance wise, The Tech Report have the full details of course, our good friends squeezing in a nice analysis after a couple of days with the hardware.  We'll let them tell you where it stacks up, be sure and read the coverage, but let's just say that Redwood is a deeply impressive little piece of silicon.  Go read to find out why.

It shouldn't be too long before ATI flesh out the rest of their sub-$99 lineup too, so keep an eye out for that.

Discuss on the forums

Tagging

ati ± radeon, redwood, eyefinity, dx11, cheap


Latest Thread Comments (28 total)
Posted by Squilliam on Saturday, 16-Jan-10 18:08:42 UTC
Quoting Lightman
For me HD5670 will be an upgrade option to my HD4670 when the price will fall to £50-£60 range.

Till then I'm waiting patiently! (besides I must upgrade my old WinXP MCE to W7 so I can use all the bells and whistles of DX11:wink:)
I want to figure out a way that I need one of these cards! But since I can I will have to satisfy Ruby in another way, perhaps by buying a bigger card sometime down the track.

Its a good upgrade from XP to Windows 7, but the file system changes came with a shock. At least a new AMD graphics chip is enough to soften the blow. :grin:

Posted by Thorburn on Tuesday, 19-Jan-10 10:02:21 UTC
Quoting FrameBuffer
So ATI is killing off any hopes of sub 5800 series trifire ? That's a shame.. not everyone wants to drop a grand for Tri-Fire.
Why would you want to anyway? I've rarely seen much (cost effective) performance scaling past 2 cards in anything other than 3DMark.If you want that level of performance just go up to a pair of 5850's and enjoy some decent performance when multi-GPU compatibility fails you.

Posted by FrameBuffer on Tuesday, 19-Jan-10 17:51:13 UTC
Quoting Thorburn
Why would you want to anyway? I've rarely seen much (cost effective) performance scaling past 2 cards in anything other than 3DMark.

If you want that level of performance just go up to a pair of 5850's and enjoy some decent performance when multi-GPU compatibility fails you.
For many people out there, they don't see it as dropping down $600-700 for an initial investment for a pair of video cards.. They see it as get medium performance NOW.. then as prices come down invest a little bit .. then later as prices bottom out complete it out for bottom dollar pricing. (I'll repost what I had wrote elsewhere)): If someone buys a 5770 now at $150.. then in 6 months buys another 5770 at $100 then then are exceeding the 5850 in performance while at a lower price point.. then say 3-6 months down the road is able to buy 2 more 5770s off ebay for 2 GPUs.. the same can be said about those who crossfire 5970s.. the return is abysmal to say the least, hardly worth it for many people but that doesn't exclude people from doing so.

Oh and IF someone is THAT worried about "multi-GPU compatibility" failing then they would obviously just wait for the next generation of GPU that would offer mulit-GPU performance in a single GPU.. thus they would always be waiting.

Posted by swaaye on Tuesday, 19-Jan-10 19:59:15 UTC
Or you can just buy the high end and hold onto it for 2-3 years, through several generations, like me. :DIt makes upgrading way more exciting.

Posted by Thorburn on Wednesday, 20-Jan-10 09:04:51 UTC
[QUOTE=FrameBuffer;1382738]For many people out there, they don't see it as dropping down $600-700 for an initial investment for a pair of video cards.. They see it as get medium performance NOW.. then as prices come down invest a little bit .. then later as prices bottom out complete it out for bottom dollar pricing. (I'll repost what I had wrote elsewhere)): If someone buys a 5770 now at $150.. then in 6 months buys another 5770 at $100 then then are exceeding the 5850 in performance while at a lower price point.. then say 3-6 months down the road is able to buy 2 more 5770s off ebay for

Posted by green.pixel on Sunday, 24-Jan-10 21:02:06 UTC
Quoting swaaye
Or you can just buy the high end and hold onto it for 2-3 years, through several generations, like me. :D

It makes upgrading way more exciting.
8800GTX and 9700Pro supported that idea, because of the specific factors and time period they were released in.
MS developed DX9 with R300 arch. in mind. And G80 was released in the midst of devs switching to console development.

After R300, for best perfomance one would have to go something like GF6800 ->GF7800 -> X1900. Crazy. :grin:

Posted by 3dcgi on Sunday, 24-Jan-10 21:34:19 UTC
Microsoft never develops an API with specific vendor hardware in mind. I'm not sure how that speculation has lasted so long.

Posted by green.pixel on Sunday, 24-Jan-10 21:44:13 UTC
I didn't mean literally of course, but R3xx shined in DX9 compared to NV30 flop. And yes, I know FX series perfomed poorely due to its arch., not API.
Did ATI work closely with MS to design R300 with DX9 in mind? What is the true story behind that speculation? :)

Posted by 3dcgi on Sunday, 24-Jan-10 22:50:21 UTC
All vendors work closely with Microsoft, but the lead time on designing a graphics card is long and sometimes you have to choose a direction before Microsoft commits. In the DX9 time frame a big decision was mixed precision vs. single precision in the shaders.

Posted by green.pixel on Sunday, 24-Jan-10 23:50:02 UTC
Thanks.
I thought it was like today with tessellation in DX11, developers already having ATI cards 6+ months.


Add your comment in the forums

Related ati News

ATI releases OpenGL4.0 preview driver, for great justice
ATI 5830 launched, baffled looks follow
ATI Cypress Gaming Performance Analysis
ATI Catalyst 10.1 Display Driver
ATI 5970 comes out to play, completes ATI's lineup
AMD OpenCL development platform for CPU and GPU
ATI Cypress GPU and architecture analysis
ATI RV740 GPU and Architecture analysis
ATI Radeon HD 5870 released, powered by new DX11 GPU
ATI Radeon HD 4890 launched at $250 with improved GPU