Catalyst 8.1 WHQL & Hotfix hit the street

The red team has made their monthly delivery of WHQL'ed Catalyst
goodness, in this case version 8.1. Several recent games such as
Bioshock, F.E.A.R., World in Conflict, and others are called out in
the release notes for improvements. Get the drivers themselves here for Vista x64, Vista x86 and XP.
To go with, in what is distressingly becoming something of a parallel tradition in recent months, AMD has also released a "hotfix" 8.1 Catalyst that is not WHQL'ed. As this driver claims to address the recent and severe issues that some AGP Radeon owners have reported, it is quite likely that it will be met with joy in some corners.
Having said that, with AMD apparently settling into a habit with these "hotfix" drivers it may be time to ask what's going on here? If WHQL is really the way to go, as has been the ATI position for many years, why all these hotfixes? And why are what are obviously a full driver release package being called a "hotfix" anyway? Because "hotfix" is 50% better than "beta" (6 chars vs 4, see?)? The reality is that most enthusiasts are used to thinking of a "hotfix" as a patch --an incremental update that requires a base package to be in place before it can be installed. This most certainly does not describe ATI's hotfixes and is therefore open to confusion and customers installing multiple versions of drivers unnecessarily.
So, what's up, AMD? In our view, it's time to call a beta a beta, or quit releasing them.
To go with, in what is distressingly becoming something of a parallel tradition in recent months, AMD has also released a "hotfix" 8.1 Catalyst that is not WHQL'ed. As this driver claims to address the recent and severe issues that some AGP Radeon owners have reported, it is quite likely that it will be met with joy in some corners.
Having said that, with AMD apparently settling into a habit with these "hotfix" drivers it may be time to ask what's going on here? If WHQL is really the way to go, as has been the ATI position for many years, why all these hotfixes? And why are what are obviously a full driver release package being called a "hotfix" anyway? Because "hotfix" is 50% better than "beta" (6 chars vs 4, see?)? The reality is that most enthusiasts are used to thinking of a "hotfix" as a patch --an incremental update that requires a base package to be in place before it can be installed. This most certainly does not describe ATI's hotfixes and is therefore open to confusion and customers installing multiple versions of drivers unnecessarily.
So, what's up, AMD? In our view, it's time to call a beta a beta, or quit releasing them.
Tagging
ati ± catalyst, 8.1, AGP
Related ati News
ATI shoots a Bolt through its GPU compute stack
AMD releases CodeXL 1.0
ATI 69xx Series launches - Crocodile Dundee beware
ATI 68xx Series Launches
ATI releases OpenGL4.0 preview driver, for great justice
ATI 5830 launched, baffled looks follow
ATI Cypress Gaming Performance Analysis
ATI Catalyst 10.1 Display Driver
ATI Radeon HD 5670 released, bringing DX11 for less than $100
ATI 5970 comes out to play, completes ATI's lineup
AMD releases CodeXL 1.0
ATI 69xx Series launches - Crocodile Dundee beware
ATI 68xx Series Launches
ATI releases OpenGL4.0 preview driver, for great justice
ATI 5830 launched, baffled looks follow
ATI Cypress Gaming Performance Analysis
ATI Catalyst 10.1 Display Driver
ATI Radeon HD 5670 released, bringing DX11 for less than $100
ATI 5970 comes out to play, completes ATI's lineup